12 Components of Research-Based Reading Programs
By: Texas Education Agency
As children learn to read, they learn how spoken and written language relate to each other. For this to happen, the components of the reading program, including the instructional materials selected for classroom use, must relate to one another and be orchestrated into sequences of instruction that engage all children and meet their needs. The following are twelve of the essential components of research-based programs.
1. Children have opportunities to expand their use and appreciation of oral language
- Discussions that focus on a variety of topics, including problem solving
- Activities that help children understand the world, in and out of the classroom
- Songs, chants, and poems that are fun to sing and say
- Concept development and vocabulary-building lessons
- Games and other activities that involve talking, listening and, in particular, following directions
2. Children have opportunities to expand their use and appreciation of printed language
- Activities that help children to understand that print represents spoken language
- Activities that highlight the meanings, uses, and production of print found in classroom signs, labels, notes, posters, calendars, and directions
- Activities that teach print conventions, such as directionality
- Activities in which children practice how to handle a book-how to turn pages, how to find the tops and bottoms of pages, and how to tell the front and back covers
- Lessons in word awareness that help children become conscious of individual words, for example, their boundaries, their appearance and their length
- Activities in which children practice with predictable and patterned language stories
3. Children have opportunities to hear good stories and informational books read aloud daily
Listening to and talking about books on a regular basis provides children with demonstrations of the benefits and pleasures of reading. Story reading introduces children to new words, new sentences, new places, and new ideas. They also hear the kinds of vocabulary, sentences, and text structures they will find in their school books and be expected to read and understand. Reading aloud to children every day, and talking about books and stories, supports and extends oral language development and helps students connect oral to written language.
4. Children have opportunities to understand and manipulate the building blocks of spoken language
- Language games that teach children to identify rhyming words and to create rhymes on their own
- Activities that help children understand that spoken sentences are made up of groups of separate words, that words are made up of syllables, and that words can be broken down into separate sounds
- Auditory activities in which children manipulate the sounds of words, separate or segment the sounds of words, blend sounds, delete sounds, or substitute new sounds for those deleted
5. Children have opportunities to learn about and manipulate the building blocks of written language
- Alphabetic knowledge activities in which children learn the names of letters and learn to identify them rapidly and accurately
- A variety of writing activities in which children learn to print the letters that they are learning to identify
- Writing activities in which children have the opportunity to experiment with and manipulate letters to make words and messages
6. Children have opportunities to learn the relationship between the sounds of spoken language and the letters of written language
Increasing children's awareness of the sounds of spoken language and their familiarity with the letters of written language prepares them to understand the alphabetic principle-that written words are composed of patterns of letters that represent the sounds of spoken words.
- Alphabetic awareness activities in which children learn that printed words are made up of patterns of letters
- Lessons in sound-letter relationships that are organized systematically and that provide as much practice and review as is needed
- Activities in which children combine and manipulate letters to change words and spelling patterns
7. Children have opportunities to learn decoding strategies
Efficient decoding strategies permit readers to quickly and automatically translate the letters or spelling patterns of written words into speech sounds so that they can identify words and gain rapid access to their meanings. Children must learn to identify words quickly and effortlessly, so that they can focus on the meaning of what they are reading.
Research indicates that good readers rely primarily on print rather than on pictures or context to help them identify familiar words, and also to figure out words they have not seen before. For this reason, it is important that children learn effective sounding-out strategies that will allow them to decode words they have never seen in print.
Some strategies of decoding instruction focus primarily on the relationships between sounds and letters; others combine letter-sound practice with word families, with word parts (for example, onsets and rimes), and with blending activities. More advanced decoding strategies focus on structural analysis, the identification of root words, and prefixes and suffixes.
Instruction should introduce "irregular" words in a reasonable sequence and use these words in the program's reading materials. It is important to realize, however, that essentially all words must become "sight words" - words children identify quickly, accurately, and effortlessly.
- Practice in decoding and identifying words that contain the letter-sound relationships children are learning to read and need for reading and writing
- Practice activities that involve word families and rhyming patterns
- Practice activities that involve blending together the components of sounded-out words
- "Word play" activities in which children change beginning, middle, or ending letters of related words, thus changing the words they decode and spell
- Introduction of phonetically "irregular" words in practice activities and stories
8. Children have opportunities to write and relate their writing to spelling and reading
- Activities that are related to the words that children are reading and writing
- Proofreading activities
- An emphasis on pride in correct spelling
- Lessons that help children attend to spelling conventions in a systematic way
- Activities that surround children in words and make reading and writing purpose-filled
9. Children have opportunities to practice accurate and fluent reading in decodable stories
The words in decodable stories do emphasize the sound-letter relation ships the children are learning. While many predictable and patterned books provide children with engaging language and print experiences, these books may not be based on the sound-letter relationships the children are learning.
Decodable stories provide children with the opportunity to practice what they are learning about letters and sounds. As children learn to read words, sentences, and stories fluently, accurately, and automatically, they no longer have to struggle to identify words and are free to pay closer attention to the meaning.
Research asserts that most children benefit from direct instruction in decoding, complemented by practice with simply written decodable stories. Further, for some children this sort of systematic approach is critical. Stories should "fit" the child's reading level. Beginning readers should be able to read easily 90 percent or more of the words in a story, and after practice should be able to do so quickly, accurately, and effortlessly.
10. Children have opportunities to read and comprehend a wide assortment of books and other texts
As children develop effective decoding strategies and become fluent readers, they must read books and other texts that are less controlled in their vocabulary and sentence structure. They learn to use word order (syntax) and context to interpret words and understand their meanings. Soon, they become enthusiastic, independent readers of all kinds of written material including books, magazines, newspapers, computer screens, and more!
- Daily time for self-selected reading
- Access to books children want to read in their classrooms and school libraries
- Access to books that can be taken home to be read independently or to family members
11. Children have opportunities to develop and comprehend new vocabulary through wide reading and direct vocabulary instruction
Written language places greater demands on children's vocabulary knowledge than does their everyday spoken language.
In fact, many of the new words children learn in a year are learned from concrete and meaningful experiences from being read to and as they read on their own.
- Wide reading of a variety of genres, both narrative and informational
- Instruction that provides explicit information both about the meanings of words and about how they are used in the stories the children are reading
- Activities that involve children in analyzing context to figure out the meaning of unfamiliar words in a reading passage
- Discussions of new words that occur during the course of the day, for example in books that have been read aloud by the teacher, in content area studies and in textbooks
- Activities that encourage children both to use words they are learning in their own writing, and to keep records of interesting and related words
12. Children have opportunities to learn and apply comprehension strategies as they reflect upon and think critically about what they read
Written language is not just speech written down. Instead, written language offers new vocabulary, new language patterns, new thoughts, and new ways of thinking. Comprehension depends on the ability to identify familiar works quickly and automatically, which includes fluent reading, as well as the ability to figure out new words. But this is not enough.
Comprehension also depends upon the understanding of word meanings, on the development of meaningful ideas from groups of words (phrases, clauses, and sentences) and the drawing of inferences. It also depends upon the demands of the text (its concepts, its density), and the knowledge the reader brings to the text. The discussion of good books with their friends and classmates is one avenue for making these connections.
- Activities that help children learn to preview selections, anticipate content, and make connections between what they will read and what they already know
- Instruction that provides options when understanding breaks down (for example, rereading, asking for expert help, and looking up words)
- Guidance in helping children compare characters, events, and themes of different stories
- Activities that encourage discussion about what is being read and how ideas can be linked (for example, to draw conclusions and make predictions)
- Activities that help children extend their reading experiences though the reading of more difficult texts with the teacher
As these components are translated into classroom experiences, children will have opportunities to talk, read, and write in the many ways they use language both inside and out of the classroom. Because the language arts (reading, writing, listening and speaking) are so interrelated, children must be given the opportunity to practice the strands of language arts in connected and purposeful ways.
Classroom experiences that offer children opportunities to write for real life reasons include having children write letters of invitation to parents and other community members to visit their classrooms, or writing letters of thanks to individuals and organizations that have contributed to their school. Children write to record newly acquired information, to reflect on what they are learning and to organize their ideas. They also work in groups to write reports on special topics.
Classroom experiences that offer children opportunities to read, listen and speak for real life purposes include the reading of "everyday" notes, news, messages, lists, labels, and the reading of compositions and reports written in the classroom. In such classrooms, reading, writing, listening, and speaking become important and meaningful to every child.
Click the "References" link above to hide these references.
Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning About Print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Anderson, R. C., Hiebert, E. H., Scott, J. A., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (1985). Becoming a Nation of Readers: The Report of the Commission on Reading. Champaign, IL: Center for the Study of Reading. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
Baker, S. K., Kame'enui, E. J., Simmons, D. C., Stahl, S. (1994). Beginning reading: Educational tools for diverse learners. School Psychology Review, 23, pp. 372-391.
Bear, D. R., Invernizzi, M., Templeton, S., & Johnston, F. (1996). Words their way: Word study for phonics, vocabulary, and spelling. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Beck, I. L., & Juel C. (1992). The role of decoding in learning to read. In S. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (2nd ed., pp. 101-123). Newark, DE: International Reading Association
Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (1991). Conditions of vocabulary acquisition. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 789-814). New York: Longman.
Biemiller, A. (1994). Some observations on beginning reading instruction. Educational Psychologist, 29, pp. 203-209.
Blachman, B. A. (1984). Relationship of rapid naming ability and language analysis skills to kindergarten and first-grade reading achievement. Journal of Education Psychology, 76, pp. 610-622.
Blachman, B. A. (1991). Getting ready to read: Learning how print maps to speech. In J. Kavanagh (Ed.), The language continuum: From infancy to literacy (pp. 1-22). Washington, DC: U. S. Dept. of Health and Human Services.
Brophy, J. and Good, T. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. Handbook on Research on Teaching (3rd ed.). M. Wittrock (Ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Calfee, R. C., & Moran, C. (1993). Comprehending orthography, social construction of letter-sound in monolingual and bilingual programs. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, pp.205-225.
Calfee, R. C. A. (1995). Behind-the-scenes look at reading acquisition. Issues in Education, 1, pp. 77-82.
California Reading Task Force. (1995). Every child a reader. Sacramento, CA: Department of Education.
Chall, J. S. (1967). Learning to read: the great debate. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Clay, M. M. (1972). Reading: The patterning of complex behavior. Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.
Clay, M. M. (1991). The early detection of reading difficulties (3rd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Clay, M. M. (1991). Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Cummins, J. (1981). The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language of minority students. Sacramento, CA: Department of Education.
Cunningham, P. (1991). Phonics they use: Words for reading and writing. New York: Teachers College Press.
Ehri, L. C. (1986). Sources of difficulty in learning to spell and read words. In M. L. Wolraich & D. Routh (Eds.), Advances in developmental and behavioral pediatrics (Vol. 7, pp. 121-195). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Ehri, L. C. (1987). Learning to read and spell words. Journal of Reading Behavior, 19, pp. 5-31
Ehri, L. C. (1991). Development of the ability to read words. In R. Barr, M. L. Karmil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 2, pp. 383-417). New York: Longman.
Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1985). Movement into reading: is the first stage of printed word learning visual or phonetic? Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 163-179.
Foorman, B. R. (in press). The case for early reading intervention. Foundations of reading acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fox, B., & Routh, D. K. (1975). Analyzing spoken language into words, syllables, and phonemes: Adevelopmental study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 4, pp. 331-412.
Goldfield, B. A., & Snow, C. A. (1984). Reading books with children: The mechanics of parental influences on childrenï¿½s reading achievement. In J. Flood (Ed.), Understanding reading comprehension. Newark, DE: International Reading Association (pp. 204-215).
Graves, D. (1994). A fresh look at writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Hodgkinson, J. L. (1992). A demographic look at tomorrow (Report No. ISBN-0-937846-57-0). Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED 359 087).
Hodgkinson, H. L. (1993). American education: The good, the bad, and the task. Phi Delta Kappan 74, pp. 619-623.
Johnston, F., Juel, C., & Invernizzi, M. (1995). Guidelines for volunteer tutors of emergent and early readers. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Bookstore.
Juel, C. (1994). Learning to read and write in one elementary school. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Kame'enui, E. J., & Carnine, D. W. (Eds.). (in press). Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners. Columbus, OH: Merrill Education, Prentice Hall.
Kirk, C. (1079). Patterns of word segmentation in preschool children. Child Study Journal, 9, pp. 37-49.
Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, A. M. (1991). The alphabetic principle and learning to read. In Phonology and reading disability: Solving the reading puzzle. Washington, DC: International Academy for Research in Learning Disabilities, Monograph Series, U. S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service; National Institutes of Health.
Lindamood, C., Bell, N., & Lindamood, P. (1992). Issues in phonological awareness assessment. Annals of Dyslexia, 42, pp. 242-259.
Lindamood C., Lindamood, P. (1975). The A. D. D. program: auditory discrimination in depth (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: SRA Division, Macmillan/McGraw-Hill.
Lundberg, I., Grost, J., & Peterson, O. P. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, pp. 264-284.
Lyon, G. R. (1994). Research in learning disabilities at the NICHD. Bethesda, MD: NICHD Technical Document/Human Learning and Behavior Branch.
Mason, J. M. (1980). When do children begin to read: An exploration of four-year-old childrenï¿½s letter and word reading competencies. Reading Research Quarterly 15, pp. 203-227.
McKeown, M. G. (1985). The acquisition of word meaning from context by children of high and low ability. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, pp. 482-496.
Meltzer, N. S., & Herse, R. (1969). The boundaries of written words as seen by first graders. Journal of Reading Behavior, 1, pp. 3-14.
Miller, C., & Winick, D. M. (1996, November). Public school accountability: The Texas story. Texas Monthly, pp. 112-118.
Moats, L. C. (1995). Spelling: Development, Disabilities, and instruction. Timonium, MD: York Press.
Nagy, W. E. (1988). Teaching vocabulary to Improve reading comprehension. Urbanna, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Nagy, W. E., & Anderson, R. C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19, pp. 304-330.
Nagy, W. E., Anderson, R. C., & Herman, P. A. (1987). Learning word meanings from context during normal reading. American Educational Research Journal, 24, pp. 2370270.
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
Perfetti, C. A., & Lesgold, A. M. (1979). Coding and comprehension in skilled reading and implications for reading instruction. In L. B. Resnick & P. A. Weaver (Eds.), Theory and practice of early reading (Vol. 1, pp. 57-840) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Pearson, D. (1993). Focus on research: Teaching and learning reading: A research perspective. Language Arts, 70, pp. 502-511.
Pearson, D. (in press). Reclaiming the center. To appear in a volume by M. Graves and B. Taylor. New York: Teachers in College Press.
Pressley, M., & Rankin, J. (f1994). More about whole language methods of reading instruction for students at risk for early reading failure. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 9, pp. 157-168.
Pressley, M., & Woloshyn, V. (Eds.) (1995). Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves childrenï¿½s academic performance (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
Reid, J. F. (1966). Learning to think about reading. Educational Research, 9, pp. 56-62.
Rozin, P., Bressman, B., & Taft, M. (1974). Do children understand the basic relationship between speech and writing? The mow-motorcycle test. Journal of Reading Behavior, 6, pp.327-334.
Share, D. L., & Stanovich, K. E. (1995). Cognitive processes in early reading development: Accommodation individual differences into a mode of acquisition. Issues in Education: Contributions from Educational Psychology, 1, pp.1-57.
Shefelbine, J. (Fall 1995). Learning and using phonics in beginning reading. Thrust for Educational Leadership, 25, pp. 8-9.
Speer, O. B., & Lamb, G. S. (1976). First-grade reading ability and fluency in naming verbal symbols. The Reading Teacher, 26, pp. 572-576.
Stahl, S. A. (1992). Saying the "p" word: Nine guidelines for exemplary phonics instruction. The Reading Teacher, 43, pp. 618-625.
Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, pp. 32-71.
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some Consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, pp.360-407.
Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & Cramer, B. B. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, pp. 175-190.
Sulzby, E. (1983). A commentary on Ehriï¿½s critique of five studies related to letter-name knowledge and learning to read: "Broadening the question." In L. M. Gentile, M. L. Kamil, & J. S. Blanchard (Eds.), Reading research revisited. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
Tummer, W. E., Herriman, M. L., & Nesdale, A. R. (1988). Metalinguistic abilities and beginning reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, pp. 134-158.
Vellutino, F. R. (1991). Introduction to three studies on reading acquisition: Convergent findings on theoretical foundations of code-oriented versus whole-language approaches to reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, pp. 427-443.
Williams, J. P. (1991). The meaning of a phonics base for reading instruction. In All language and the creation of literacy (pp. 9-19). Baltimore, MD: Orton Dyslexia Society.
Yopp, H. K. (1988). The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, pp. 159-177.
Excerpted from: Beginning Reading Instruction: Components and Features of a Research-Based Reading Program. (1996). Texas Education Agency.