Understanding Sensory Integration
By: Marie E. DiMatties (2004)
Michael is a third grade student who is waiting for the school bus. He is challenged by sensory experiences during everyday activities that most of us don't even think about. While he's still reeling from the battle with his mom over brushing his teeth (that peppermint toothpaste tastes like fire in his mouth) the school bus pulls up. Michael runs past the bus monitor's haze of perfume and sits at the back of the bus. In his heightened state, he becomes even more aware of his new school shirt with its stiff label and that awful feeling like a wire brush being poked into the back of his neck. The sensory experiences of the movement of the bus, the sound of his excited classmates laughing and yelling above the roar of the bus engine all contribute to his increased agitation. By the time Michael arrives at school he is wound up and ready to unravel. There is no time to wait for the bus monitor's direction...getting off the bus quickly becomes a matter of survival and he resorts to pushing, shoving and finally kicking his way out. Unfortunately, there is a price to pay for this seemingly outward aggression...he can expect another trip to the principal's office.
This digest defines sensory integration and dysfunction in sensory integration (DSI). It outlines evaluation of DSI, treatment approaches and implications for parents and teachers, including compensatory strategies for minimizing the impact of DSI on a child's life.
What is Sensory Integration?
- Touch - tactile
- Sound - auditory
- Sight - visual
- Taste - gustatory
- Smell - olfactory
In addition, there are two other powerful senses:
a) vestibular (movement and balance sense)-provides information about where the head and body are in space and in relation to the earth's surface.
b) proprioception (joint/muscle sense)-provides information about where body parts are and what they are doing.
What is Dysfunction in Sensory Integration (DSI)?
Dysfunction in sensory integration is the "inability to modulate, discriminate, coordinate or organize sensation adaptively" (Lane et al., 2000, p. 2).
How efficiently we process sensory information affects our ability to:
a) discriminate sensory information to obtain precise information from the body and the environment in order to physically interact with people and objects. An accurate body scheme is necessary for motor planning, i.e., being able to plan unfamiliar movements. It involves having the idea of what to do, sequencing the required movements, and executing the movements in a well-timed, coordinated manner.
Michael frequently bumps into others and drops items on the way to class because of his poor body scheme. He often hands in crumpled assignments that reflect the challenges of holding a pencil in his hand and making precise movements to achieve legible handwriting. Concentrating on his school work intensely may lead him to fall off his chair. To most people, Michael appears to be a sloppy, clumsy, and forgetful child.
In gym class, Michael cannot master jumping jacks, somersaults make him feel sick, and he has given up on ever being able to connect with a baseball. His timing was always off. He resorts to being the class clown to cover up for his difficulties. Michael certainly doesn't feel good about himself. He can't do what other kids seem to do so effortlessly-and then there is the teasing
b) modulate sensory information to adjust to the circumstances and maintain optimum arousal for the task at hand. Sensory modulation is the "capacity to regulate and organize the degree, intensity and nature of responses to sensory input in a graded and adaptive manner" (Miller & Lane, 2000).
Sensory defensiveness, a type of sensory modulation problem, is defined by Wilbarger and Wilbarger (1991) as "a constellation of symptoms related to aversive or defensive reactions to non-noxious stimuli across one or more sensory systems" (Wilbarger & Wilbarger, 2002a, p. 335) It can affect changes in the state of alertness, emotional tone, and stress (Wilbarger & Wilbarger, 2002a).
Michael demonstrates many symptoms of sensory defensiveness, which affect his attention, learning, and behavior. His teacher's instructions get lost in competition with a clock ticking, the echo of peers walking and talking in the hall. He is off task and he finds solace in humming or chewing on the end of his pencil, sensory seeking behaviors that help ease the discomfort. Fortunately, he has gym class before lunch. Running bases in gym class gives him a legitimate opportunity for the "heavy work" that his body needs. It sure makes him feel better and prepares him for the biggest challenge of all- eating lunch in the school cafeteria.
How is DSI identified?
- Gathering information about the child's performance in daily life tasks within the context of the classroom, school, and/or home environment.
- Skilled observation of the child: the therapist sets up a play environment and observes the child's responses to different types of sensory input and motor planning ability.
- Parent/caregiver sensory questionnaires /standardized checklists, e.g., Sensory Profile (Dunn, 1999), non-standardized checklists.
- Parent/caregiver interview: the therapist identifies specific functional problems related to problems with sensory processing.
- Standardized tests of general development and motor functioning, e.g., Sensory Integration and Praxis Test Battery (SIPT) (Ayres, 1989).
- Clinical observations of posture, coordination, etc.
Intervention for DSI
Fostering the child's participation in normal everyday childhood activities or "occupations" is the main goal of occupational therapy. Intervention starts when teachers and parents are taught about DSI and intervention so they can develop strategies that help with adaptation or compensation for dysfunction (Bundy & Koomar, 2002). Based on information gathered, the therapist collaborates with teachers and parents to design an intervention plan to address the child's sensory integration problems.
Intervention based on Sensory Integration Theory
- environmental modifications
- adaptations to daily routines
- changes in how people interact with the child (Wilbarger & Wilbarger, 2002)
Examples are reducing distracting visual materials in the classroom, giving the child an alternative to a messy art activity, or refraining from wearing perfume or bright, floral clothing.
A sensory diet is a strategy that consists of a carefully planned practical program of specific sensory activities that is scheduled according to each child's individual needs. Like a diet designed to meet an individual's nutritional needs, a sensory diet consists of specific elements designed to meet the child's sensory integration needs. The sensory diet is based on the notion that controlled sensory input can affect one's functional abilities (Wilbarger & Wilbarger, 2002b). A sensory diet can help maintain an age appropriate level of attention for optimal function to reduce sensory defensiveness.
Wilbarger & Wilbarger's (200b) comprehensive approach to treating sensory defensiveness includes education and awareness, a sensory diet, and other professional treatment techniques. One such technique is the Wilbarger Protocol, which uses deep pressure to certain parts of the body followed by proprioception in the form of joint compressions. It is critical that this protocol is not used in isolation and that it is initiated and monitored by an appropriately trained therapist.
The "How Does Your Engine Run?" Program (Williams & Shellenberger, 1994) is a step-by-step method that teaches children simple changes to their daily routine (such as a brisk walk, jumping on a trampoline prior to doing their homework, listening to calming music) that will help them self-regulate or keep their engine running "just right." Through the use of charts, worksheets, and activities, the child is guided in improving awareness and using self-regulation strategies.
Traditional sensory integrative therapy
Traditional sensory integrative therapy takes place on a 1:1 basis in a room with suspended equipment for varying movement and sensory experiences. The goal of therapy is not to teach skills, but to follow the child's lead and artfully select and modify activities according to the child's responses. The activities afford a variety of opportunities to experience tactile, vestibular, and proprioceptive input in a way that provides the "just right" challenge for the child to promote increasingly more complex adaptive responses to environmental challenges. The result is improved performance of skills that relate to life roles, e.g., player, student, (Schaaf & Anzalone, 2001). This type of intervention may be used along with other treatment approaches.
DSI can have a profound effect on a child's participation in everyday childhood "occupations," including play, study and family activities. Collaboration between the therapist, teacher, and parent is the most efficient way to understand the child's behavior and unique sensory needs. Together, they can implement strategies to support the child's performance in roles and occupations across multiple environments.
Sensory Integration Resource Center - provides links to Internet resources and research about Dysfunction in Sensory Integration (DSI) for parents, educators, occupational therapists and physicians. Available: http://www.sinetwork.org/
The ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education (ERIC EC)
The Council for Exceptional Children
1110 N. Glebe Rd.
Arlington, VA 22201-5704
Toll Free: 1.800.328.0272
Click the "References" link above to hide these references.
Ayres, A. J. (1972). Sensory integration and learning disorders. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services. Ayres, A. J. ( 1989). Sensory integration and praxis tests. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Bundy, A. C., Lane, S. J., & Murray, E. A. (2002) Sensory integration: Theory and practice. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
Dunn, W. (1999). Sensory Profile. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.
Kranowitz, C. S. (1998). The out of sync child. New York: The Berkley Publishing Group.
Lane, S. J., Miller, L. J., & Hanft, B. E. (2000). Towards a consensus in terminology in sensory integration theory and practice: Part 2: Sensory integration patterns of function and dysfunction. Sensory Integration Special Interest Section, 23(2), 1-3.
Miller, L. J. & Lane, S. J. (2000). Towards a consensus in terminology in sensory integration theory and practice: Part 1: Taxonomy of Neurophysiological Processes. Sensory Integration Special Interest Section, 23(1), 1-4.
Quirk, N. J. & DiMatties, M. E. (1990). The relationship of learning problems and classroom performance to sensory integration. Haddonfield, NJ: Author. Available: www.amazon.com.
Wilbarger P. & Wilbarger, J. (1991). Sensory defensiveness in children aged 2-12: An intervention guide for parents and other caregivers. Denver, CO: Avanti Educational Programs.
Williams, M. S., & Shellenberger, S. (1994). How Does Your Engine Run? Albuquerque: Therapy Works.
Sammons, Jennifer H. - The ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education (ERIC EC)- ERIC EC Digest ED478564 - May 2003