I’ve been too busy to keep up with you parent people on this board. But for Dad and construction worker guy and the rest of you who type your smiley as :) and don’t include the nose, here it is officially.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) — It was 20 years ago today that Scott Fahlman taught the ‘Net how to smile. The IBM researcher has devoted his professional life to artificial intelligence, the practice of teaching computers how to think like humans. Fahlman is known for his work with neural networks — a computer technique designed to mimic the human brain — and helping develop Common Lisp, a computer language that uses symbols instead of numbers, but the bearded scientist is perhaps best known for a flash of inspiration that helped to define Internet culture, in all of its ungrammatical glory.
On September 19, 1982, Fahlman typed :-) in an online message.
The “smiley face” has since become a staple of online communication, allowing 12-year-old girls and corporate lawyers alike to punctuate their messages with a quick symbol that says, “hey, I’m only joking.”
Fahlman’s innovation has since inspired countless other “emoticons” like ;-) to signify a wink or :-0 to show surprise.
“I’ve certainly spent 10 times as much time talking with people about it as I did coming up with it in the first place,” Fahlman said from his Pittsburgh home. “Hopefully my actual research career will add up to more in the long run.”
In the early 1980s, computer networks were rarely found outside university science departments and secretive government facilities. But even then, discussions on primitive online “bulletin boards” could quickly turn nasty when touchy users misinterpreted remarks meant to be taken lightly.
After a particularly tangled joke about mercury contamination in an elevator, users of a Carnegie Mellon University bulletin board proposed a variety of markers for humorous comments, including +, %, &, (#) and —/.
Fahlman suggested :-), along with the admonition to “read it sideways.” Before long, other bulletin board users were placing the smiley face in their messages. The practice spread as Internet users found the symbol useful as a rough approximation of a twinkle in the eye.
A few frowns Predictably, the smiley face encountered a few frowns as the online population exploded.
“Humans have managed to communicate with the written word for thousands of years without strewing crudely fashioned ideograms across their parchments. It is as if the written word were
a cutting-edge technology without useful precedents,” groused Neal Stephenson in the New Republic in 1993.
Fahlman stands by his creation. “If Shakespeare were tossing off a quick note complaining about the lack of employee parking spaces near the Globe Theater, he might have produced the same kind of sloppy prose that the rest of us do,” Fahlman writes on his Web site.
Yahoo!, Microsoft and America Online all incorporate emoticons into their instant-messaging systems, while telecom firms, jewelry makers and online retailers have filed trademark applications for products and slogans that incorporate Fahlman’s smiley face. AOL Time Warner is the parent company of America Online and CNN.com.
But Fahlman has never seen a dime from his creation.
“If it cost people a nickel to use it, nobody would have used it. This is my little gift to the world, for better or worse,” he said.
http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/internet/09/19/offbeat.smiley.reut/index.html
Actually it wasn't casual
I went to NPR whichlinked to the whole blooming thread that talked about how to tell whether something was a joke or not — true geekspeak :-) — and there was some debate over which symbol should mean “IT’S A JOKE@!!!!” until this guy declared the smiley and explained it. PP wouldn’t be visiting the NPR website though!
here's the "nu English" article in case any are in
From the NY Times
September 19, 2002
Nu Shortcuts in School R 2 Much 4 Teachers
By JENNIFER 8. LEE
EACH September Jacqueline Harding prepares a classroom presentation on the common writing mistakes she sees in her students’ work.
Ms. Harding, an eighth-grade English teacher at Viking Middle School in Guernee, Ill., scribbles the words that have plagued generations of schoolchildren across her whiteboard:
There. Their. They’re.
Your. You’re.
To. Too. Two.
Its. It’s.
This September, she has added a new list: u, r, ur, b4, wuz, cuz, 2.
When she asked her students how many of them used shortcuts like these in their writing, Ms. Harding said, she was not surprised when most of them raised their hands. This, after all, is their online lingua franca: English adapted for the spitfire conversational style of Internet instant messaging.
Ms. Harding, who has seen such shortcuts creep into student papers over the last two years, said she gave her students a warning: “If I see this in your assignments, I will take points off.”
“Kids should know the difference,” said Ms. Harding, who decided to address this issue head-on this year. “They should know where to draw the line between formal writing and conversational writing.”
As more and more teenagers socialize online, middle school and high school teachers like Ms. Harding are increasingly seeing a breezy form of Internet English jump from e-mail into schoolwork. To their dismay, teachers say that papers are being written with shortened words, improper capitalization and punctuation, and characters like &, $ and @.
Teachers have deducted points, drawn red circles and tsk-tsked at their classes. Yet the errant forms continue. “It stops being funny after you repeat yourself a couple of times,” Ms. Harding said.
But teenagers, whose social life can rely as much these days on text communication as the spoken word, say that they use instant-messaging shorthand without thinking about it. They write to one another as much as they write in school, or more.
“You are so used to abbreviating things, you just start doing it unconsciously on schoolwork and reports and other things,” said Eve Brecker, 15, a student at Montclair High School in New Jersey.
Ms. Brecker once handed in a midterm exam riddled with instant-messaging shorthand. “I had an hour to write an essay on Romeo and Juliet,” she said. “I just wanted to finish before my time was up. I was writing fast and carelessly. I spelled `you’ `u.’ ” She got a C.
Even terms that cannot be expressed verbally are making their way into papers. Melanie Weaver was stunned by some of the term papers she received from a 10th-grade class she recently taught as part of an internship. “They would be trying to make a point in a paper, they would put a smiley face in the end,” said Ms. Weaver, who teaches at Alvernia College in Reading, Pa. “If they were presenting an argument and they needed to present an opposite view, they would put a frown.”
As Trisha Fogarty, a sixth-grade teacher at Houlton Southside School in Houlton, Maine, puts it, today’s students are “Generation Text.”
Almost 60 percent of the online population under age 17 uses instant messaging, according to Nielsen / NetRatings. In addition to cellphone text messaging, Weblogs and e-mail, it has become a popular means of flirting, setting up dates, asking for help with homework and keeping in contact with distant friends. The abbreviations are a natural outgrowth of this rapid-fire style of communication.
“They have a social life that centers around typed communication,” said Judith S. Donath, a professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Media Lab who has studied electronic communication. “They have a writing style that has been nurtured in a teenage social milieu.”
Some teachers see the creeping abbreviations as part of a continuing assault of technology on formal written English. Others take it more lightly, saying that it is just part of the larger arc of language evolution.
“To them it’s not wrong,” said Ms. Harding, who is 28. “It’s acceptable because it’s in their culture. It’s hard enough to teach them the art of formal writing. Now we’ve got to overcome this new instant-messaging language.”
Ms. Harding noted that in some cases the shorthand isn’t even shorter. “I understand `cuz,’ but what’s with the `wuz’? It’s the same amount of letters as `was,’ so what’s the point?” she said.
Deborah Bova, who teaches eighth-grade English at Raymond Park Middle School in Indianapolis, thought her eyesight was failing several years ago when she saw the sentence “B4 we perform, ppl have 2 practice” on a student assignment.
“I thought, `My God, what is this?’ ” Ms. Bova said. “Have they lost their minds?”
The student was summoned to the board to translate the sentence into standard English: “Before we perform, people have to practice.” She realized that the students thought she was out of touch. “It was like `Get with it, Bova,’ ” she said.
Ms. Bova had a student type up a reference list of translations for common instant-messaging expressions. She posted a copy on the bulletin board by her desk and took another one home to use while grading.
Students are sometimes unrepentant.
“They were astonished when I began to point these things out to them,” said Henry Assetto, a social studies teacher at Twin Valley High School in Elverson, Pa. “Because I am a history teacher, they did not think a history teacher would be checking up on their grammar or their spelling,” said Mr. Assetto, who has been teaching for 34 years.
But Montana Hodgen, 16, another Montclair student, said she was so accustomed to instant-messaging abbreviations that she often read right past them. She proofread a paper last year only to get it returned with the messaging abbreviations circled in red.
“I was so used to reading what my friends wrote to me on Instant Messenger that I didn’t even realize that there was something wrong,” she said. She said her ability to separate formal and informal English declined the more she used instant messages. “Three years ago, if I had seen that, I would have been `What is that?’ “
The spelling checker doesn’t always help either, students say. For one, Microsoft Word’s squiggly red spell-check lines don’t appear beneath single letters and numbers such as u, r, c, 2 and 4. Nor do they catch words which have numbers in them such as “l8r” and “b4” by default.
Teenagers have essentially developed an unconscious “accent” in their typing, Professor Donath said. “They have gotten facile at typing and they are not paying attention.”
Teenagers have long pushed the boundaries of spoken language, introducing words that then become passé with adult adoption. Now teenagers are taking charge and pushing the boundaries of written language. For them, expressions like “oic” (oh I see), “nm” (not much), “jk” (just kidding) and “lol” (laughing out loud), “brb” (be right back), “ttyl” (talk to you later) are as standard as conventional English.
“There is no official English language,” said Jesse Sheidlower, the North American editor of the Oxford English Dictionary. “Language is spread not because not anyone dictates any one thing to happen. The decisions are made by the language and the people who use the language.”
Some teachers find the new writing style alarming. “First of all, it’s very rude, and it’s very careless,” said Lois Moran, a middle school English teacher at St. Nicholas School in Jersey City.
“They should be careful to write properly and not to put these little codes in that they are in such a habit of writing to each other,” said Ms. Moran, who has lectured her eighth-grade class on such mistakes.
Others say that the instant-messaging style might simply be a fad, something that students will grow out of. Or they see it as an opportunity to teach students about the evolution of language.
“I turn it into a very positive teachable moment for kids in the class,” said Erika V. Karres, an assistant professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill who trains student teachers. She shows students how English has evolved since Shakespeare’s time. “Imagine Langston Hughes’s writing in quick texting instead of `Langston writing,’ ” she said. “It makes teaching and learning so exciting.”
Other teachers encourage students to use messaging shorthand to spark their thinking processes. “When my children are writing first drafts, I don’t care how they spell anything, as long as they are writing,” said Ms. Fogarty, the sixth-grade teacher from Houlton, Maine. “If this lingo gets their thoughts and ideas onto paper quicker, the more power to them.” But during editing and revising, she expects her students to switch to standard English.
Ms. Bova shares the view that instant-messaging language can help free up their creativity. With the help of students, she does not even need the cheat sheet to read the shorthand anymore.
“I think it’s a plus,” she said. “And I would say that with a + sign.”
Glad to see you are not wasting that mega-expensive ‘puter the district outfitted your office with…
Catching up on a little light reading? It has been said that the entire body of literary works are out there in cyberland, but I gues the good stuff is too buried in the fluff and hacked adult sites. (They still blocking those on your server o did you get one of the kids to show you how to backdoor your way past the firewall?)
Actually, it is kind of interesting really Petey. To think that someone off-handedly typed :-) and created what would expand into nettalk… (For a different take on this same topic, see this morning’s NY Times about the encroachment of IM shorthand into formal writing.)
But really Petey, besides the grudge you hold for me over the many verbal thrashings I have dispensed in your direction, why direct this at me? I almost never use emoticons, noseless or otherwise ;). (And by-the-by, when using yahoo messenger, many of the emoticons do not have noses, and should you put them in they will not be turned into little pictures, so it ain’t just me and “that construction guy”…)
You must be really bored… I would think with that huge stack of IEP’s for you to alter and otherwise destroy and the Novemeber tests coming around that you need to inflate you would be far too busy for such fluff. Or did you finally retire??? (I know, that is hoping for too much. Like a canker I expect you will keep flaring up here for quite sometime. :(
But there is some good news Pete old Bean… I will get to see a bit more of you this year than in years past… The support group I am a part of has decided to exercise our right to bring friendly faces to IEP’s and I have been carefully squirreling away my vacation time at work so I can go in as a “friendly face” to keep you from being too very unprofessional (vicious?) in your treatment of my fellow parents. :D
Which reminds me, did you ever get that copy of the Wither’s decision I forwarded to you? I left it with your secretary over the summer. Thought it would make for some good reading in those off-times when playing yet another round of spider solitaire gets a little stale.
Cya in a couple of weeks PP!