Algozzine, B., O’Shea, D. J., Crews, W. B., & Stoddard, K. (1987). Analysis of mathematics competence of learning disabled adolescents. *Journal of Special Education, 21*, 97-107.

Cawley, J. F., Baker-Kroczynski, S., & Urban, A. (1992). Seeking excellence in mathematics education for students with mild disabilities. *Teaching Exceptional Children, 24*, 40-43.

Ellis, E. S., & Lenz, B. K. (1996). Perspectives on instruction in learning strategies. In D. D. Deshler, E. S. Ellis, & B. K. Lenz (Eds.), *Teaching adolescents with leaning disabilities *(2 nd ed., pp. 9-60). Denver, CO: Love Publishing Co.

Gagnon, J. C., & Maccini, P. (in press). Teacher use of empirically-validated and standards-based instructional approaches in secondary mathematics.* Remedial & Special Education. *

Hutchinson, N.L. (1993). Effects of cognitive strategy instruction on algebra problem solving of adolescents with learning disabilities. *Learning Disabilities Quarterly*, *16*, 64-63.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446.

Lenz, B. K., Ellis, E. S., & Scanlon, D. (1996). *Teaching learning strategies to adolescents and adults with learning disabilities*. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed, Inc.

Maccini, P. (1998). *Effects of an instructional strategy incorporating concrete problem representation on the introductory algebra performance of secondary students with learning disabilities*. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.

Maccini, P., & Hughes, C. A. (2000). Effects of a problem-solving strategy on the introductory algebra performance of secondary students with learning disabilities. *Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15,* 10-21.

Maccini, P., McNaughton, D., & Ruhl, K. (1999). Algebra instruction for students with learning disabilities: Implications from a research review. *Learning Disability Quarterly, 22,* 113-126.

Maccini, P., & Ruhl, K. L. (2000).Effects of a graduated instructional sequence on the algebraic subtraction of integers by secondary students with learning disabilities. *Education and Treatment of Children, 23,* 465-489.

Miller, S. P. (1996). Perspectives on math instruction. In D. D. Deshler, E. S. Ellis, & B. K. Lenz (Eds.), *Teaching adolescents with leaning disabilities *(2 nd ed., pp. 313-367). Denver, CO: Love Publishing Co.

Montague, M. (1988). Strategy instruction and mathematical problem solving. *Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities, 4*, 275-290.

Montague, M., Bos, C. S., & Doucette, M. (1991). Affective, cognitive, and metacognitive attributes of eighth-grade mathematical problem solvers. *Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 6, *145-151.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). *Principles and standards for school mathematics.* Reston, VA: Author.

No Child Left Behind Act. Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Pub. L. 107-110, § 2102(4) (2001).

Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M. C. Witrock (Ed.), *Handbook of research on teaching *(3 rd ed., pp. 376-391). New York: Macmillan.

Thurlow, M., Albus, D., Spicuzza, R., & Thompson, S. (1998). *Participation and performance of students with disabilities: Minnesota’s 1996 Basic Standards Tests in reading and math* (Minnesota Report 16). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.

Thurlow, M. L., Moen, R. E., & Wiley, H. I. (2005). *Annual performance reports: 2002-2003: State assessment data.* Minneapolis, MN: National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved August 17, 2005, from http://education.umn.edu/nceo/OnlinePubs/APRsummary2005.pdf